A process flowchart or detailed traveler. How potential failures of intended functions are evaluated Identifying and assessing potential risks of the design requirements. Identifying and assessing potential risks with process operating parameters and meeting product specifications. The evaluation criteria for Detection ratings usually focuses on: An evaluation of the ability of design controls related to the product or process to prevent or detect mechanisms of failure.
An evaluation of the ability of process controls mistake-proofing, fail-safes, gages to prevent a failure mode or cause from occurring or detect the effect of a failure if a failure has occurred.
Helpful Links:. FMEA documents are best utilized as living documents so that the product, process, or system is evaluated throughout the lifecycle to maintain and continuously improve reliability and quality. When performing a Design FMEA, you begin by defining the system hierarchy, or the breakdown of all the individual components of your product.
The breakdown can be as detailed as you like. For example, you may start your DFMEA early in the design phase when a high-level breakdown is available, and then as your design matures, continue to refine that breakdown into lower level elements. Once your product design is broken down into components, you analyze the potential failure modes of each element. You then follow the remaining steps of the FMEA procedure as described earlier. DFMEAs are use to analyze a product during the design stage.
Their main purpose is to ascertain and mitigate critical effects of failures prior to manufacture and deployment. Your cost is limited to the engineering time for redesign. Moving onto production, if a problem is uncovered, the resulting costs go up tremendously. Production shutdown, re-engineering, retest, and restarting production are costly and ineffective. Lastly, failures uncovered in the field are the most costly. You may be facing recalls, product replacement, and repairs, as well as all the costs associated with determining the root cause and necessary corrective actions.
Add to that the almost immeasurable cost of harm to your reputation and company standing, and you can see why eliminating problems early on is key to business success. You can track pass and fail testing, as well as keep track of progress and issues that may arise.
Process FMEAs are used to analyze and maintain process control objectives. The PFD shows the flow of the process or equipment that is under analysis. Elements of a PFD resemble those of a flowchart, or flowsheet. This graphical view allows the overall process to be easily understood and grasped.
Typically, there is a start node and an end node and then the interim blocks indicate the process steps to be analyzed. PFDs include information based on your process requirements and specifications, such as product and process characteristics. This allows you to track and manage your requirements to ensure they are all met, and that all elements of your specifications are covered in your analysis.
You consider each process step and determine the potential failure modes associated with each one. The remaining portions of the analysis are then completed: determine the effects of the failure modes, assess the risks of those effects, and then the actions required to eliminate or mitigate those effects. Detection ranking assigns a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 means that failure cannot occur, while 10 stands for almost impossible to detect.
Detection rank designation — Image source. Now, you might be curious: Do I choose prevention control or detection control for my project? The answer is that you should always aim to have robust prevention control in a place where possible. As explained earlier, prevention control eliminates the cause or mechanism of failure, which has an impact on the occurrence.
Detection control identifies when failure has occurred but does not prevent it. The Risk Priority Number is calculated simply by multiplying severity, occurrence, and detection which were covered in steps 4, 7, and 8 respectively. The value you get will be between 1 and as all 3 factors are ranked on a scale of 1 to The higher the RPN, the higher the risk involved. This is where design modifications are considered and take us to our next step in determining corrective actions.
A low RPN on a particular item does not mean there are no risks. Good design practice would be to look at the design holistically and see where the RPN can be lowered, even when it is already low. Critical components that have high RPN require special care with specific recommendations.
These recommendations can take the form of revising the design to look for engineering guidelines that may have been missed, starting from scratch with a new design, or taking additional recommendations into considerations.
All these actions aim to see how to adjust severity, occurrence, and detection. As a guide, severity should only change if the failure has been removed — which may involve a complete design change. Assess each cause or mechanism carefully with a focus on removing or using control measures. To lower detection, you can implement more preventative measures bearing in mind that these might increase costs.
You can note the actual finished date so that you can keep track of where you were before the project execution, as you progress throughout the sheet with design changes. You decided to change some aspects of the design to remove or lower the failure modes and effects. After the new calculation and mistake-proofing, there is a slight decrease in occurrence and detection.
But you are still not satisfied. Do you continue recalculating and redesigning? Further consultations with a multi-disciplinary team may be necessary.
We are also not considering whole items, subparts of interfaces. Lightning arrestor system — Image source. We can see from the table above, that the RPN is in all cases. If our predetermined RPN threshold was for example, then we would have to find ways to reduce our failure modes by looking at the severity, occurrence, and detection of each item.
It is a qualitative tool that zooms in on current processes to see where they can be improved and helps in developing new, reliable and efficient, processes. For instance, if you are changing the design of an existing product, the manufacturing process also has to be reestablished. This exchange is crucial in refining the removal of risks in a project to improve the design and process quality.
Process FMEA should also be performed by a cross-functional team led by the process owner. The rest of the team should consist of members of different departments like:.
Each team member should be experienced in his field so they are able to understand how the analyzed process will impact their department and what are the limitations of the process from their perspective. PFMEA begins with reviewing the process by using a process map. The diagram shows from input to output all the activities associated with each process, including interfaces.
To put it simply, the process map guides the team from the moment a process starts to the moment it ends by providing a logical manner to assess what details are involved in its entire journey. It is assumed that the materials and the way they are designed to fulfill acceptable standards.
If there is reason to believe that defects, quality issues, design flaws, or information from historical records count towards better analysis, then these take precedence over the assumptions. Process failure effects impact end-users, internal customers, external customers, subsequent operations, locations, timeline, planning, and execution. System model of a failure — Image source. These impacts should be consistent with what was already decided by the team during the DFMEA brainstorming.
The severity column in the PFMEA worksheet looks at the criticality of the effects of each failure mode. It reflects how bad the situation might become if the failure mode is not resolved. The severity column assigns a scale of 1 to 10 to measure just how serious the result would be.
Again, this is a relative scaling based on the experience and knowledge of the multidisciplinary team. We already mentioned how each number is classified in DFMEA, but to refresh your memory, here it is again:. The classification column helps to prioritize the failure modes that require urgent attention, special products material sensitivity in certain environments , and requirements legislation.
The aim is to identify these weaknesses to see what should and can be done to correct them. Some degree of assumption is needed to know if the current process controls are robust enough. You will imagine that a particular process has failed to see how the other processes might be affected. Doing so narrows down the risks involved and helps to identify how different processes are interconnected.
This can tricky to estimate.
0コメント